Digit vs Stretch
Digit
Agility Robotics
Amazon 98% task success rate. GXO 100K+ totes moved. Toyota Canada RaaS deployment. RoboFab 10,000-unit/year capacity.
Full profileSpec Comparison
| Spec | Digit | Stretch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Humanoid | Logistics |
| Price | ~$250,000 (RaaS ~$10-12/hr) | Enterprise pricing |
| Year | 2025 | 2022 |
| Height | 175cm | 200cm |
| Weight | 65kg | ~1200kg |
| Payload | 16kg | 23kg |
| Speed | 5.1km/h | 1.5m/s |
| Battery | 4hr | 8hr |
| OS | ROS2 | BD Orbit |
AI and Software
Digit
- Behavior trees
- Object detection
Stretch
- Pick AI
- Case detection
Digit wins on versatility, Stretch wins on throughput
Agility Robotics' Digit (humanoid, $250K) and Boston Dynamics' Stretch (wheeled case-handling robot, $150K) both target warehouse logistics, but they solve different problems. Stretch wins decisively on case-picking throughput — it can unload a 40-foot shipping container in under 25 minutes, moving 800+ cases per hour on its mobile base. Digit wins on versatility: as a full humanoid capable of navigating stairs, ramps, and human-designed spaces, it can handle tasks Stretch's fixed-arm-on-wheels design cannot reach. For pure case-moving volume in distribution centers, Stretch is the better investment today. For facilities that need a robot that can handle diverse logistics tasks across complex environments — and that will expand in capability over time — Digit's humanoid form factor is the stronger long-term bet.
Digit is better for
diverse logistics environments requiring navigation and task flexibility across human-designed spaces
Stretch is better for
high-throughput container unloading and pallet-level case picking where Stretch's specialized design dominates